Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 00:07

What’s next?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
In space, no one can hear you scream — But it still gets incredibly noisy - Salon.com
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Inside Sly and the Family Stone’s Great, Lost Live Album - Rolling Stone
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Denise Austin’s 5 Habits to Tackle Stubborn Belly Fat - Eat This Not That
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What is the difference between Music.ai and Moises.ai?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Why is Nickelback known to be a bad band?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Steam gamers given 24 hours to grab hit game completely free - GAMINGbible
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
My husband asked me why do I keep on complaining about him cheating. Why don't I just leave?